Difficult to make subsets of results visible to a subset of clinicians (e.g., for occupational health or private hospitals). |
Results can be locked down to specific requesting clinicians in specific requesting organisations. |
Integrating fringe requesters is expensive, and, due to the volume and sensitivity of patient data held, Trusts are wary of making ICE available on the internet. |
LabReach was designed to be internet accessible and is supported by robust security measures like multi-factor authentication, encryption, and a web firewall. |
Requesting clinicians that aren’t connected to hospital networks and/or HSCN cannot order tests electronically. |
Requesting clinicians can order paperless tests from any labs on the network with just an internet connection. |
Remote, at-home test requesting requires using paper-based workflows, creating inequity in healthcare. |
Digital-first, web-based, and mobile-friendly order comms in any setting. |
Clinicians can typically only request from their local laboratory, which can be a problem for regional or national programs. |
Labs can give access to any clinician anywhere in the country, and clinicians can order from more than one lab. |
Clinicians are unable to order from two or more labs simultaneously, preventing out-of-catchment requesters (e.g., Mental Health Trusts) from sending electronic requests. |
Most clinicians who use an EPR that is not integrated with ICE order on paper. |
Clinicians can order directly via LabReach, with a lookup to the NHS Spine to rapidly retrieve patient details. |
Licence fee can be prohibitively expensive and based on the size of the requesting organisation, regardless of usage and test volumes. |
Licence fee charged on a transaction-based model, according to test-request volume. |
Requesters are charged to connect to the system. |
Requesters aren’t charged to connect to LabReach. |